9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon

There are more loose ends than this one, but this one is telling of far more than an attempt at covering up bungling.

Anyone who had more than one neuron firing would have known that the Intelligence Community was going to take the hit for 9/11.

I have always thought it interesting that the two heads of agencies that took the biggest hits regarding 9/11 were the two agency heads that the Bush anti-Clintons would hold over to serve in their administration. What a coincidence; but only one of many.

The 9/11 investigation should be re-opened, since there are so many loose ends, it is the event that supposedly changed everything and it is the excuse for every bone-headed policy that the Bush administration has foisted upon us and the world ever since.

This time, make sure there are no people anywhere near the investigation who have a conflict of interest.

The cycle of hell in which we currently find ourselves, began in Lower Manhattan, and my strong hunch is, that is where it must also end, finally.

Speaking of coincidences, what the hell ever happened to the anthrax investigation? At it's worst, weaponsized anthrax was used in an attempt to assassinate the Democrat leaders of the Senate. That seems pretty heavy duty to me.

Odd that Bush can't take a breath without mentoning 9/11, but he never mentions the anthrax flying through the mail and frightening far more Americans than did 9/11, not to mention news media and the opposition party. It is as if it never happened.

Can't help but wonder why?

9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon:

Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.

Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response to the hijackings, these sources said.