Rumsfeld Critics May Get Their Day on the Hill:
" We want to share with the American people the degree of illegality of the U.S. assault on Fallujah and to prove that the ROE for that assault were so meaningless and vague as to permit any atrocity whatsoever. The ROE in effect, as judged by the actions of military personnel and the resulting death toll, indicate violations of international and domestic law as a matter of official policy. What words did the U.S. military use to authorize the war crimes that occurred in Fallujah, including the use of excessive force, indiscriminate and incessant bombing, sniping, and killing in urban civilian areas, white phosphorous, depleted uranium, flechette and cluster bombs, targeting medical structures and personnel, etc.?
Similarly, the need for the U.S. to cover up and lie about the nature of the destruction of that city, and the reasons behind its destruction, were highlighted by the murderous attack, on March 4, 2005, of the one reporter from a Western country available to describe the atrocities being committed by the U.S. The decision to attempt to kill Giuliana Sgrena and her escorts was a cold-blooded attempt to silence the witnesses, and not an attack authorized by any reasonable ROE.
It is in the interest of national security, honor, integrity, and the rule of law that we seek the release of this information from the U.S. military, specifically from CENTCOM. There are times in the history of this country and especially during time of military conflict that the American people must themselves judge what actions pursued by military forces serve their interest and security. The American people have a right to know what methods of destruction are being employed by its military as we wage wars against our 'enemies' throughout the world. And if there are meaningful limits to the use of that force, we"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment