Election Theft 2004, finally gets a little attention.

It will require much more!

Rolling Stone : The 2004 Election:

Snow tried to deflect the question with a joke, suggesting that the reporter should serve as Bush's 'emissary from Rolling Stone.' But many citizens, journalists and elected officials are taking our four-month investigation of vote-rigging in Ohio far more seriously ['Was the 2004 Election Stolen?' RS 1002]. The debate began online, where the story set off a firestorm. More than 700,000 people logged on to rollingstone.com to read the story, and thousands of bloggers posted heated entries about Kennedy's report.

The online furor caught the attention of some in the mainstream press, which has long downplayed the evidence of vote tampering. In The New York Times, Bob Herbert devoted an entire column to our investigation, concluding that John Kerry 'almost certainly would have won Ohio' if Republicans had not blocked so many of his supporters from casting ballots. And The Seattle Post-Intelligencer blasted the media for its 'deafening' silence on Kennedy's report. 'In terms of bad news judgment,' the paper observed, 'this could turn out to be the 2006 equivalent of the infamous Downing Street memo' -- evidence that the Bush administration falsified intelligence on WMDs to justify invading Iraq -- 'that was initially greeted by the U.S. media with a collective yawn.