Nick Turse on 12-Pentagon Steps to a Misfit Military

Outrageous, sad, shameful, incompetent, stupid, criminal...and more

TomDispatch - Tomgram: Nick Turse on 12-Pentagon Steps to a Misfit Military:

Recently, the Washington Post, and then the New York Times, reported a top-secret assessment by the Marines' Chief of Intelligence that focused on the catastrophic situation of his undermanned Corps in the heartlands of Iraq's Sunni insurgency. He concluded, according to the Post's Tom Ricks, that 'the prospects for securing that country's western Anbar province are dim and that there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation there.'

Couldn't get much worse, you'd think. Then, Major General Richard C. Zilmer, the senior Marine commander, decided to 'dispute' both news accounts. His argument, according to Michael Gordon of the Times was that 'he had sufficient forces to carry out his mission but that the mission did not include defeating the insurgency.'

Come again? Fortunately, in a front page piece, 'Growing Concern: Terrorist Havens in 'Failed States'' on the possibility that Iraq, Lebanon, and Afghanistan might all turn into the kinds of terrorist safe territories that only Afghanistan had been prior to September 11, 2001, the Wall Street Journal's Yochi J. Dreazen and Philip Shishkin sum up the latest 'desired endstate' of the Bush administration this way: 'U.S. officials acknowledge their main goal in Iraq now is to prevent it from turning into a place run by fundamentalists who export terrorism to the region.'